Home » INTERNATIONAL MARKETS’ INFLUENCE ON COWS` MILK IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

INTERNATIONAL MARKETS’ INFLUENCE ON COWS` MILK IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

Автор(и) (Име и Презиме):
Lazo Dimitrov
Research Associate, PhD, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, Institute of Agriculture, Skopje

Bodan Andonov
Wayfair Deutschland Ltd., Berlin, Germany

Vesna Mrdalj
Associate Professor, PhD, University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska

Marija Gjosheva Kovachevikj
Research Associate, PhD, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, Institute of Agriculture, Skopje

Наслов на статија:
INTERNATIONAL MARKETS’ INFLUENCE ON COWS` MILK IN THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA

DOI:
https://www.doi.org/10.55302/ED25370d

PDF
Abstract:

In the last decade, the competitiveness of livestock production in North Macedonia has been constantly decreasing, primarily due to declining of production and productivity. Livestock contributes around 30% to agriculture gross value added, with cattle and cows` milk as the primary sources. In 2023, raw cows` milk production reached around 2.4 million litres. According to the Common Market Organization, there are about 12,000 specialized dairy producers, with rather small herds (less than 10 cows). This study examines the competitiveness of the dairy sub-sector and international markets influence on Macedonian cows` milk prices. It analyses a series of 204 monthly cows` milk price data from January 2005 to December 2021, comparing Macedonian prices with those in the EU and non-EU markets, using statistical econometric methods. In general, Macedonia has lower purchase milk prices (EUR 28.95), compared to EU (EUR 32.77) per 100 kg, but still following the EU price trends. The correlation between Macedonian and EU prices is moderate (0.52). The Macedonian prices react slowly to international market changes with 3-month delay, according to the lag tests (BIC, HQIC, AIC, FPE). The Granger causality test highlights the impact of international shocks, such as Covid-19 and Ukraine crises, on market instability.

Keywords: cows` milk prices, international prices, agri-food prices, forecasting

JEL Classification: Q11

REFERENCES

  • Armington, P. S. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.
  • Asche, F., Jaffry, S., & Hartmann, J. (2007). Price transmission and market integration: Vertical and horizontal price linkages for salmon. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39, 2535–2545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500486524
  • Azzam, A. (1999). Asymmetry and rigidity in farm-retail price transmission. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81.
  • Balcombe, K., & Morrison, J. (2002). Commodity price transmission: a critical review of techniques and an application to selected tropical export commodities. A study for FAO – ESCR.
  • Conforti, P. (2004). Price transmission in selected agricultural markets. In FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research. Working Paper No. 7.
  • Dhar, T., & Cotterill, R. W. (1998). A structural approach to price transmission in non competitive market channels: a study on the fluid milk market. Draft ERS.
  • Dornbusch, R. (1987). Exchange Rates and Prices. American Economic Review, 77, 93-106.
  • EC Agridata. (2022). European Commission. Retrieved from Monthly market prices, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development: https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DashboardPrice/DashboardMarketPrices.html
  • Esposti, R., & Listorti, G. (2013). Agricultural price transmission across space and commodities during price bubbles. Agricultural Economics. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00636.x
  • European Commission. (2008, 5 20). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, Tackling the challenge of rising food prices – Directions for EU action.
  • Fackler, P. L., & Goodwin, B. K. (2001). Spatial market integration. Handbook of Agricultural Economics. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Publishing.
  • Froot, K., & Klemperer, D. (1989). Exchange Rate Pass-Through when Market Share Matters. American Economic Review, 79, 637-654.
  • Goodwin, B. K., & Holt, M. T. (1999). Price Transmission and Asymmetric Adjustment in the US Beef Sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 630-637.
  • Irwin, S., Sanders, D., & Merrin, R. (2009). Devil or Angel? The Role of Speculation in the Recent Commodity Price Boom (and Bust). Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41(2), 377-391. doi:10.1017/S1074070800002856
  • Knetter, M. (1993). International Comparisons of Pricing to Market Behaviour. American Economic Review, 83(3), 473- 486.
  • (2021). Annual Agricultural Report of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management.
  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics (8 ed.). London Macmillan and Co. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/1676
  • McCorriston, S., Morgan, W. C., & Rayner, A. J. (2001). Price transmission: the interaction between firm behaviour and returns to scale. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28.
  • (2017). International Regulatory Co-operation and Trade: Understanding the Trade Costs of Regulatory Divergence and the Remedies. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264275942-en
  • Saadi, H. (2011). Price Co-movements in International Markets and Their Impacts on Price Dynamics. In: Piot-Lepetit, I. and M’Barek, R., Methods to Analyse Agricultural Commodity Price Volatility. Springer Verlag, 149-164.
  • STIPS (2022). Sistem tržišnih informacija poljoprivrede Srbije. https://www.stips.minpolj.gov.rs/
  • SSORNM (2022). State Statistical Office of Republic North Macedonia MakStat – database, Agricultural output price indices, 2015=100, monthly.
  • Tomek, G. W., & Robinson, L. K. (2003). Agricultural Product Prices. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
  • Wohlgenant, M. K. (1999). Product heterogeneity and the relationship between retail and farm prices. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26, 219-227.